Generation Defined by Harry Potter

       In class we were asked what is a defining thing in our generation such as a movie, book or show. The generation I'm talking about are the children of the generation X or the kids born somewhere in the late 1980's early 1990's. I chose to represent our generation by the series Harry Potter, which we practically grew up with.  Harry Potter the character in the movie as I remember has always been around the same age as me from each movie, maybe that's why it was so much more recognizable to me. The characters all had certain qualities that others in my age group did.

       Our generation is much more seen to be whinny and given everything in our life. Just like in Harry Potter sure Ron was poor but he sure seemed to have all the food he desired. Herminone never was short of a book and Harry had presents periodically flown to him. Also my generation has dealt with the normalcy of being without a "normal" family in cases of increasing divorce rates, adoption, and foster care. Harry relates to that as himself being an orphan and the children in Harry Potter being separated at times from parents; as in the case of Herminones human parents. Harry's experience to entering Hogwarts and the magical world was that of new and unknown  possibilities. This relates much to my generation being raised in the new technology era, the endless possibilities. Also characters like Herminone with high self confidence from an early age helps in representing a change in the way girls in my generation see themselves, there is a sense of self strength and ability to be who they are.  The thing that most correlates with the Harry Potter Series and my generation is the curiosity. Harry and his friends were always exploring and trying to discover new things that surround them is what I can relate to the most. Our generation has had to deal with the ever so changing environment around us due to technology, exploring and learning as we go.

Reality TV

        Chuck Klosterman article about how he thought reality TV was changing American culture actually made some sense for me. The fact that these fake made TV characters are making a certain type of characteristic like figures to our society isn't so hard for me to wrap my mind around. The fact that this article was made in the past shows how much larger reality TV now fits into our lives. Present day there is a reality TV show for about anything one can think of.  Me personally, have never found much interest in the idea of watching someone else's life, but it is becoming increasingly popular. Earlier in our class I remember us discussing people being famous for being famous, also know as all these reality TV stars.
        Chuck goes on to describe in his article that people in their everyday life use reality TV references that used to not exist. He discusses the reason why these types of shows are so popular are because of their relatable connection, but also the exaggeration version from normal life. He also describes how the characters in reality TV need to believe that their original and never has anything like them happened before. We talked in class how their is a false image that can easily be made to form how the audience interprets a character. Also how producers of these shows can even influence when certain drama disputes are to up the ratings. Chucks idea of how reality TV is changing the way people react in society is semi true, but also the fact where their acquiring their image is very much manipulated.

Stereotyping Country Listeners

         In class we were given a list of random adjectives of what we think  listeners of country music are like; then given the same list to describe what we thought others would list country listeners as. In fact some of the choices were very high listed in both being patriotic or humble. We discussed how you can't describe a person by what they listen to. Sure there are certain looks people associate with the "country look" but when we were asked to describe it wasn't by looks at all, it was personality traits.

         The reason though that I believe people do not fit into their stereotypes is, there are so many different genres and different subgroups inside of them to label a person as a type. The reason certain music is labelled aggressive and another seen as patriotic is all about how you reference yourself to the music. Does one make you think of gangs&young or the other unintelligent&flags. Yes certain types of music can be associated with other things. But the main thing is you can not identify a person that enjoys a music genre by certain stereotypical ideas that go along with the music.

Bootleg Culture

       As of now bootlegging music is illegal. As I read the article by Pete Rojas at the end when he said should this type of music be only available to those able to pay licensing fee, I thought absolutely not. If this music is a genre like any other its the expression of the creator. Where the bits and pieces originated from isn't as interesting as what was made to create something completely different from its origins. He made some key ideas about the fear of the music industry, they shouldn't be attacking this new form of genre but help in its production to be available to listeners everywhere. Even though its seen as a threat there is potential for it to be a good thing if handled properly.
       I think one of the points this article showed to me was, that bootlegging is an advancement in the creativity of music. Just as the internet will continue to increase in its possibilities, bootlegging creates the opportunity of old hits to once again be introduced to the new generations. There is an appreciation in how someone can mix some of the old hits with the new to create something new altogether. Even though the music industry is afraid of losing money, Pete goes over the fact that those who are creating the bootlegs are not altogether profiting financially. Bootlegging is just showing how people are able, to now interact and create with the music they know by means of technology.